Friday, January 31, 2020

A remarkable man


My namesake* and great-grandfather Ebenezer Prior was a most remarkable man. The Priors were woolstaplers as far back as the Middle Ages, when wool was the backbone of the country's economy. The late Mr Hollins, founder of The Wool Record, discovered that a Mr John Prior of Chichester represented the woolmen of the district  at a wool convocation held at York during the reign of Edward I  (who reigned from 1239-1307). During this convocation the Great Company of the Staple, an extremely powerful trade guild, was established. Chichester was one of the nine 'staple' towns of England at that time. (Wool Record, 29 December 1949).  Ebenezer Prior was born in 1848 and lived in Chichester for most of his life, where he made a huge impact. His grandfather Mr Reeves and his father J W Prior were woolstaplers. Ebenezer took over and re-established the business which became known as Ebenezer Prior Ltd, becoming one of the two most noteworthy businesses in Chichester (the other being Shippams, the well-known potted meat company. The Shippams became related by marriage to the Priors.)   The business is long gone, but is commemorated by a street and carpark named 'Woolstaplers'.
*see my entry of 17 September 2019 entitled 'Ebenezer'
 
 
 
 
Ebenezer Prior + family

 Back Row:             Mary,    Ebenezer Senior,     Hannah,              John
Middle row: Rhoda, Ebenezer,   Emily Senior,    Sydney,    Emily,             Jessie
Seated:                                            Gilbert, Mark,               Richard
 
 
 









Chichester in the 19th Century had become an unpleasant environment, especially for the poor.  The streets were unpaved, filthy and only feebly lit by gas lighting at some street corners. It was barely safe to walk alone through the areas of St Pancras and Somerstown.



Ebenezer served as a member of the City Council from 1889 to 1896, and was elected mayor in 1895.   He was chairman of the Rural District Council of Chichester whilst it existed, and a JP for the County. He was also Chief Magistrate for many years, and was a member of the Board of Guardians (who were responsible for overseeing the workhouse), and was chairman for 13 consecutive years. 



Alcohol

Ebenezer Prior was a man of deep Christian conviction - the main motivation behind all his actions recounted in this essay - and had a great heart for the poor. As a young man, he would take port wine after his meals, but in his role as Chief Magistrate he saw at first hand the devastating effects of cheap alcohol, and the widespread drunkenness which led to criminal behaviour.  There were 102 public houses in Chichester, which he attacked as 'low in tone' and frequently 'houses of ill repute', 'dens of gambling and drunkennness.'   He did all he could to suspend licences and lessen the number of inns in the city. In 1889 Ebenezer achieved considerable unpopularity by challenging the quantity of drink served in the workhouse

     He became uncomfortable when passing sentence on people whose crimes were influenced by alcohol, so to ease his conscience he became an abstainer, and eventually became President of the Total Abstainers Society.  Inevitably his actions aroused the wrath and enmity of those whose livelihoods depended on selling alcohol.







 Ebenezer did his utmost to improve the lot of the inmates of the workhouse. He was instrumental in getting trained instead of pauper nurses in the workhouse. He was eventually successful in persuading the Board of Guardians to allow the inmates to wear ordinary clothing when visiting the outside world instead of their paupers' uniforms.

Chichester workhouse

    His office at work became a rendezvous for all who were distressed and he seemed to have a gift for understanding difficult situations, and to be willing, and able, effectively to deal with them. It was often said that his object in pursuing his role on the board of guardians was because it brought him directly into touch with the poor and gave him opportunities for entering their homes. 
   One one occasion he got deeply discouraged when a minister whom he respected, said that although his intentions were good, he was wasting his time and money on these people. But very shortly after that, he was walking through the town when the driver of a passing dray halted his horses, jumped down and hurried to Mr Prior and shook his hand fervently in gratitude for his past kindnesses. He said that Mr Prior had visited his home when his wife was ill and the family were in need, and had also visited his son in prison and given him a little book (St John's gospel). This had apparently led to his son's conversion, and the drayman said that the family now read the booklet daily and prayed for God's blessing on Mr Prior.  This small event completely lifted the depression from Mr Prior and restored his confidence.



Schooling

Ebenezer was a manager of the Lancastrian Voluntary Schools. (There is still a school in Chichester today called Lancastrian Infant School). Education was under review by the government at the time, and Ebenezer was keen for better use to be made of educational charities. One such was the Oliver Whitby School, a Bluecoat school founded as an Anglican charity for underprivileged boys many years earlier, but which had become isolated from city life by a policy of not allowing the boys to be 'contaminated' by the wicked outside world. True, they attended services at the cathedral, and were seen regularly on their supervised Sunday afternoon walk, but they were kept apart from other people and the charity benefitted only the 48 boys of the school.



Oliver Whitby School (Later to become a House of Fraser store)
Ebenezer determined to press for better use of the charity. He wanted the school to expand in order to provide secondary education for Chichester pupils, and imagined that the school could provide education for upwards of 200 scholars.  He was convinced that a larger number of able children could benefit greatly by the sort of education which the Oliver Whitby School could provide. He put huge efforts into his attempt to bring this about, and by the time he was mayor in 1895 he was able to chair a committee to pursue a general inquiry into all the existing charities in Chichester with a view to their being used for the public benefit. A new bishop had been appointed and Ebenezer outlined his plans for the Oliver Whitby School to him.  In essence, his proposal was that the school should provide free education for its 48 foundation scholars, and places for upwards of 200 fee payers, and a new school provided for 125 girls. Though not an anglican himself he was happy that religious instruction should be according to the doctrines of the Church of England. Many in Chichester were flabbergasted that any man should dare to propose tampering with the Whitby school. Least of all should schemes emanate from Prior who was notorious for his strict manner of life and still unpopular with a large faction because of his victorious campaigns against abuse at the workhouse and for main drainage (more of which below). A battle raged, and sentiment was stirred by a lawyer called Mr Bew, who was an old blue.  He shouted 'hands off the birthright of the poor' and 'beware attacks on the Church of England'. There was a public outcry against Prior, reported in the West Sussex Gazette of 25 February 1897, though the newspaper itself remained strongly supportive of him. Prior countered all arguments with reason and sanity. Chichester's battle received national coverage. The battle continued into the summer, and culminated in a meeting in July, attended by a commissioner from the Charity Commission.  Prior's supporters were interrupted and shouted down, and the meeting became 'one of the most disorderly and unmannerly I have attended for years' wrote the editor of the Gazette. 'Shouting, booing, hissing, yelling, interruptions, sensible and senseless, all the vocabulary of uncontrolled prejudice blossomed as a thistle for three hours and a half. '  (Sussex Daily News. 29/7/1897). Prior had to be accompanied by the Superintendent of Police and other policemen as he walked home to his house in Tower Street, followed by a yelling crowd, 'who treated him to the same sort of battery of missiles which they normally reserved for the Salvation Army'. Within days of the inquiry there were signs of a change of heart, and there were letters of apology to the Commissioners from all classes of people. Many of Chichester's best men were supportive of Prior, but progress at this juncture was impossible. The  trustees of the Oliver Whitby School celebrated by erecting iron fencing for the school playground, closing their minds completely to the extension of secondary education, which did not become a reality until 1928 when Chichester High School for boys opened.



Filthy water and the Drainage question.

Prior campaigned for better lighting in the city, but above all, he was agitated beyond measure by the unhygienic state of Chichester. As in so many industrial towns there was no drainage. Water was obtained from pumps or wells, and sewage was deposited in cesspits or buckets which people emptied into the river Lavant. There was therefore the great danger at all times of disease from contaminated water.  The street pumps provided water that was 'coffee coloured or 'stank', and 'cesspits overflowed into cellars'.   (all phrases expressed in the Chichester Observer around 1888).

Prior determined to do all in his power to ensure that Chichester installed a proper drainage system.  However, this meant that the cost would fall on the ratepayers, many of whom objected to this, as the main benefit would be to the poor who lived in the most deprived area, and who were not ratepayers.  Doctors would also lose income if  epidemics were checked, though doubtless this motive would not be openly admitted. It developed into a long-running battle between what became known as the Drainers Party and the Anti-drainers.  Prior was a champion of the Drainers and this caused him to be up against some bitter enemies, especially Dr Bostock, a doctor and mayor of Chichester for many years, who saw no reason for agitating for an improvement of Chichester's sanitation.

Defeat

In 1889 the anti-drainers (sometimes called the cesspool party) trounced Prior's drainers party, causing the Chichester Observer to comment that 'the majority of the inhabitants decided that the time for uniting cleanliness with godliness in a cathedral city had not yet arrived.'  (6 Nov 1889).  The whole issue gained national prominence, with critical reports of Chichester's decision in the Lancet and the British Medical Association. Prior continued to campaign almost daily for the drainage of the city, and in 1890 he won a seat on the city council. He began to win more and more support, for his drainage scheme, but it so infuriated his opponents that they ganged together to defeat his other objectives and it was a mortal blow against his scheme for the Oliver Whitby School.



Victory

(click to enlarge)

A majority of the citizens were won over to Prior's side, and in 1895 he was made mayor of Chichester.



Prior's mayoralty was very popular. During the year, he presided with ability at a luncheon which the Mayor and Corporation of Chichester  gave to Bishop Wilberforce at his enthronement and at which all the mayors of Sussex attended in their robes and chains of office.  It is noteworthy that he had the grace to do this - he was himself a non-conformist, being a member of Providence Chapel, where many other members of his family also worshipped.



Eventually Prior's proposals won the day, and a proper drainage system was built in Chichester. He also took steps to ensure that the waterworks was taken over by the city authorities.    However, all this was not in time to prevent an outbreak of disease…….



The end of  Ebenezer Prior's political career.

During his mayoralty he had to cope with a severe outbreak of typhoid fever. He threw himself with great energy into dealing with the crisis.  He visited every house where a case of sickness had been notified with the object of personally investigating the cause. In a short space of time most of the cases were isolated and an extra staff of efficient nurses engaged. Every Sunday he would visit the hospitals of the city, entering into conversation with the patients and speaking words of consolation to them.'   (The Wool Record, Jan 29th 1928)  So successfully was this outbreak contained that with nearly 120 cases, only two deaths occurred.  However, he overtaxed his strength during this trying time and was compelled by medical advice to retire from the council and take a long rest. (The campaign to extend the scope of the Oliver Whitby School rumbled on though, and when he recovered, Ebenezer continued to press during 1896 and 1897 for the provision of more secondary education at the school - all to no avail though - see above)



Ebenezer Prior Ltd - the business continued

The business continued to run, with a staff of about 40 employees. An article in Chichester Views and Reviews in 1896 said 'Mr Prior is well known for the active interest he takes in the moral as well as the material welfare of the working classes generally, and this is shown especially in the care he takes for the interests of his own employees. Being a strong advocate of total abstinence he  shows a practical desire for keeping his men from the public house by providing on the premises the means for them to obtain beverages of a non-alcoholic character. To the rear of the large ground-floor sorting room is a special room equipped with a gas stove, and here the men have the privilege of refreshing themselves with a cup of excellent tea at any time they desire it. However exceptional this may appear, it is quite in keeping with Mr Prior's well known public and private character.'   These comments may seem a little quaint today, but at the time it must have indicated that the business was more progressive than most. 



Disaster is averted

In addition to the wool business, Prior also owned a chinaware shop in Southsea which was run by a manager.  During a period of several years, this manager and a relative of Prior's defrauded him and both businesses went bankrupt as a consequence. (Prior had lent a substantial sum of money to the relative. However he was a rogue who ran off and never repaid the loan. We don't know who the relative was because the family kept his identity secret to avoid shaming him.)
 
 In 1915, one of his sons Ebenezer F Prior (my grandfather) stepped in. He was in his early 30s at the time and owned a business selling agricultural equipment.  Although he had no legal responsibility for his father's debts, he sold his own business and used the money to pay of all his father's debts, which enabled the firm to survive.  All the creditors were most astonished at EFP's action  and made their gratitude and their astonishment clear in the letters they wrote in response.

Here are two examples from a collection of many such letters…


(click to enlarge)



'...It is refreshing these days to find existing such a high moral in business, and we may hope that your strict sense of honour will merit the recognition that such an action of yours so richly deserves.'

'....We appreciate very highly your resolve to pay off these debts, notwithstanding that you are not in the slightest degree responsible for them, and can only trust that the reward you may feel for so doing may commensurate with the self-denial involved in the transaction.  Such an action is unique in the long business experience of the writer. Never in the course of the history of this company has a son taken upon himself the responsibility of clearing his father's debts. We have of course several instances where a debtor himself after a lapse of years has refunded the deficiency, but such things are not uncommon although not frequent.......'

(Nb  The cheque for £13:11:10 would at 2022 values be worth about £1600, and the cheque for £50:14:1 would be worth nearly £6000)




Finally, a letter from father to son - Eb to Eb, dated 3 September 1918.



In it he says 'I dare not attempt to express what I feel of the wonderful unselfishness of your suggestions - I can only say that it is just as I have found you - all your business life this - thinking of others rather than yourself - I praise God for you my boy, & for all of the rest of your brothers, but you have of course been so close with me, thro' the darkest shadows of my life - It is impossible for me to say in language what this has meant to me and your mother …….'



The business continued successfully in Chichester, Bradford, Taunton and Wellington for many more years. Eventually my father E J W Prior (Jack Prior) took over the business, but as time went on, the expansion of man-made fibres brought about the end of the business. Jack had had a hobby of painting  ever since he was a child. He closed the family business down and went on to pursue a  very successful and contented career as a water-colour artist in the North of England. 

Tuesday, January 21, 2020

Visions, dreams…… and silence



 In 1970 I was sent with my wife Lindsay to work in the far southwest corner of Uganda , in what seemed to me at the time to be a remote town named Kabale, over 5000 feet up in a hilly area and close to the equator.  It was a journey into the unknown for us.




 
Kabale main street

We discovered that Kabale had been in the 1930s at the centre of a remarkable growth in Christianity which became known as the East African Revival.  Missionaries had brought the message of Christianity to Uganda many years earlier, and it had taken root in a very receptive community, but for all that, the attitude members of the Church of Uganda at the time was that "provided they were baptised and confirmed and not discovered in any particular wrongdoing, they were Christians." 1




One of the key figures in the Revival was Dr Jo Church, a pioneer missionary doctor (who with his wife Decie befriended us and looked after us in Kampala when our daughter Janine was born in August 1970).  Jo had been deeply involved in the Revival, which had involved many Ugandans in repentance from drinking, lying, adultery and cheating, and had involved many expatriate Christians in repenting of their 'colonial' attitudes of superiority to, and aloofness from the very Africans amongst whom they lived and worked.



Dreams.

In 1935 Jo had been stirred by a vivid dream in which he had been challenged to forgive properly people with whom he had quarrelled in the past. 2     We discovered that  meaningful dreams had been experienced  by many others at that time too. 
"Strange reports began to come in from little country churches of  Kigezi  (Kabale was the county town of Kigezi).
 
Kigezi villages
 'Christian' leaders confessed they had never been born again at all. Sums of money, stolen years before, were returned and a great longing was born in those who loved the Lord to go out all over the district and tell others about Him. ….Through those teachers, now born again, cleansed from sin and consecrated to God, Christ himself reached out to the people. Men, women and children flocked to the churches, many brought there by dreams. Many were in paroxysms of grief and remorse as they saw their sins. There was great joy in a little church when a man of evil repute stood up and recounted how he had been told in a dream to look up the number of a certain hymn and sing it. He woke and got up at once and found that the hymn was

I lay my sins on Jesus, the spotless lamb of God

And as he sang, he turned to the Saviour." 3



Dreams and visions in the Bible

Lindsay and I were well aware that dreams, visions and direct communications by God are mentioned several times in the Bible. There are a various ways in which God sometimes speaks to people.



There's the story of Samuel, which starts with the words "In those days the word of the Lord was rare; there were not many visions" but then goes on to describe the young Samuel being spoken to directly by God. 4



There's the well known story of 'Joseph and his technicolor dreamcoat': Joseph's prophetic and accurate dreams got him into a lot of trouble, but eventually the outcome of his dreams determined not only Joseph's destiny but the destiny of the whole tribe of Hebrews, later to be known as the Israelites. 5





Then there's the other Joseph - the one who married Mary the mother of Jesus.  It's recorded that he was guided no less than four times in dreams at about the time when  Jesus was born. 6

 
Joseph's Dream - Rembrandt


Fred Lemon

I remember reading some years ago the extraordinary story of Fred Lemon (Some  of his books are still available online  second hand)  As an old lag and lifetime criminal, unsurprisingly he found his way into Dartmoor prison in the days when prisons were prisons. Quite suddenly, out of the blue, he physically met the Living Christ who came into his cell and Fred was tremendously converted. Later he received a complete healing from a debilitating back condition and he became a much sought after preacher.





Chariots of Fire

Most of us have seen or heard of the film 'Chariots of Fire'. From where did this title come? The film is about the devout Christian runner Eric Liddell who won a gold medal in the 1924 Olympics (Later he went on to do missionary work in China)


The film's title was inspired by the line, "Bring me my chariot of fire," from the William Blake poem adapted into the popular British hymn 'Jerusalem'; the hymn is heard at the end of the film.  Blake himself got the original phrase from the Bible, where there are two references to visions of chariots of fire, in 2 Kings 2.11 and  2 Kings 6.17, part of which reads  

Elisha's servant got up, went out of the house, and saw the Syrian troops with their horses and chariots surrounding the town. He went back to Elisha and exclaimed, “We are doomed, sir! What shall we do?”

 “Don't be afraid,” Elisha answered. “We have more on our side than they have on theirs.”  Then he prayed, “O Lord, open his eyes and let him see!” The Lord answered his prayer, and Elisha's servant looked up and saw the hillside covered with horses and chariots of fire all around Elisha.





Nigeria, 2019

The story about Elisha's servant and his vision has an extraordinary modern parallel in an event which happened recently in Nigeria  7
A group of 500 Nigerian Muslim-background Christians, who gathered together for safety after a string of Boko Haram attacks, were later attacked again by the Islamist militant group. Most escaped, apart from 76 men, women and children who were taken captive.
The 76 were taken to a Boko Haram terrorists’ camp where they were tortured. The four male leaders of the group were told at gunpoint to renounce their faith in Christ and revert to Islam. When they refused, holding fast to their Saviour, the men were shot in front of their families and friends.
The following week, the wives of the four martyred men were also ordered to renounce their faith or their children would be executed.

These schoolchildren are from families who were forced to flee their homes because of Boko Haram and Fulani herdsmen attacks
As the mothers struggled under this terrible burden into the night, the children came running in and said that the Lord Jesus had appeared to them and “all would be well”. According to the account, the Lord Jesus then appeared to all of the group and told them not to fear, that He would protect them. They should not renounce Him, but stay strong knowing that “He is the way, the truth and the life”.


The next morning the children, one a girl as young as four, were lined up against a wall by the terrorists and their four mothers were told they could save them if they renounced Jesus Christ and returned to Islam. The mothers refused. The soldiers cocked their rifles and prepared to take aim when they suddenly started to grab at their heads, screaming and shouting “Snakes, snakes!” Some ran away and others dropped dead where they stood.
As one of the soldiers fell down dead, a Christian captive reached down to pick up the soldier’s gun to fire at the fleeing Boko Haram militants, but the youngest child put her hand on his arm and said, “You don’t need to do that. Can you not see the men in white fighting for us?”
All 72 lives were spared and the group is now living in other regions of Nigeria that are safe for Christians. When our English-speaking contact asked their pastor why Jesus appeared to them and not to others he replied, “He does not need to. You have over 200 versions of Scripture and many people able to explain the Bible to you. These people do not.”


The Silence of God

Visions and dreams from God, are by their nature rare and therefore remarkable. Sometimes God is silent, as he was for a long time with Job, who longed to know why he had such grievous hardship, but was unable to get any response from God until God chose to speak to him. 8    Even more significantly, God was silent when Jesus was on the cross, calling out "My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?" 9

God decides when he will communicate with us. It's not for us to make demands on God about this, and certainly not to follow the alternative route of visiting a fortune teller.  10
                   ……..


The practice of fortune telling is forbidden by God. It's in the Bible, Deuteronomy 18:9-13, "When you arrive in the Promised Land you must be very careful lest you be corrupted by the horrible customs of the nations now living there. …..   No one may practice black magic, or call on the evil spirits for aid, or be a fortune teller, or be a serpent charmer, medium, or wizard, or call forth the spirits of the dead. Anyone doing these things is an object of horror and disgust to the Lord, and it is because the nations do these things that the Lord your God will displace them. You must walk blamelessly before the Lord your God."
The future is known only by God. It's in the Bible, Isaiah 8:19, "So why are you trying to find out the future by consulting witches and mediums. Don't listen to their whisperings and mutterings. Can the living find out the future from the dead? Why not ask your God?"


So what about me?

I was once having a conversation with God, and said to him, "You don't make communication very easy. You are invisible, and to most people most of the time physically inaudible.  So conversation has to be one-way.  I know you spoke directly to Samuel in the Old Testament, and have occasionally given other people the experience of directly hearing your voice, but what about me, now, today? Where are you? Miles away on heaven, or right here? Am I supposed to imagine you standing here with me, or what?"
Two responses came to my mind, which I assume to be God 'speaking' to me in reply.
1.        Jesus said that he would be right here, within me and within other believers.  So God is actually 'inside' me in a way which I cannot understand.  Jesus also said, 'where two or three are gathered together in my name, there I am amongst them.' 
2.       John 14.18ff:  I will not leave you as orphans; I will come to you. 19 Before long, the world will not see me anymore, but you will see me. Because I live, you also will live. 20 On that day you will realize that I am in my Father, and you are in me, and I am in you……Anyone who loves me will obey my teaching. My Father will love them, and we will come to them and make our home with them….       the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you.
So that's where God is!


1 Canon Bill Butler, Hill Ablaze, p56

2  J E Church: Quest for the Highest, p115

3 Patricia St John: Breath of Life, p123

4 I Samuel 3

5 Genesis 37

6 Matthew 1.18-2.23

7 Barnabas Fund magazine, March 2019

8 Job 38.1

9 Matthew 27.46

10 https://www.bibleinfo.com/en/topics/fortune-tellers   

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

Great-uncle Mark, a conscientious objector

I have been doing some research into the experiences of my great-uncle Mark Prior who was a conscientious objector in the First World War.  He went out to France with the Non-Combatant Corps. 
 
Non-combatant Corps members at work

Conscientious Objectors were deeply unpopular, so it must have required either great cowardice or great courage to be one.  In Mark's case I am sure it was courage, linked strongly with his firm Chistian faith.  

 A letter dated August 25th 1917 was received from a hospital in France.




It reads:
Dear Mrs Prior 
 I presume that you know that your son is undergoing 8 months inprisonment for  refusing to unload shells. I saw him with his six comrades last night. he was cheerful and appreciated my visit. he sleeps in a wooden hut and works in a gravel pit during the day. The food and the treatment are good. You have no need to worry. I shall keep in touch with him. Excuse more for I am writing to each home.  Yours sincerely, (Rev) M Calvwell. Chaplain.
P.S. They have made a favourable impression on the warders. M.C. 

The following typed letter was received by Mark's father (my great-grandfather) from a friend....  (Click on letter to enlarge it)




From France, Mark was sent Wormwood Scrubs Prison, and from there he was transferred to Knutsford Gaol, Cheshire, which had been redesignated Knutsford Works Centre, and where he had to do hard labour.
 
Knutsford Gaol - photo used with permission
Life was tough at Knutsford. 
I am indebted to the Knutsford military historian Tony Davies for the following information:  (his website is at www.tonydavies.me )

Almost 500 conscientious objectors were housed in the prison by the end of 1917, and a total of over 800 passed through the gates in just under three years.  The newspapers rhetoric mirrored that of the public, who had no time for them. The local shops refused to trade with them, and local workmen refused to work within the prison, now designated a ‘Work Centre’. The newspapers often referred to it as ‘an invasion of the town.’  On arrival the conscientious objectors were forced to change trains in Northwich and ’were subject to a considerable amount of jeering at the hands of munitions girls’.

Under the headline ‘Indignant Knutsford’ the Manchester Evening News tells of ‘missiles being thrown at conscientious objectors by youths’,  as they were just walking down the street. But the tension in the town began to escalate.
In Jan 18 – several conscientious objectors returning to the prison from an evening walk were confronted by a ‘large mob of locals, who threw clods of mud at them’. More conscientious objectors came out to help their associates, some carrying sticks, ‘that they were not afraid to use without any violation of conscience’. Only one injury – a wounded soldier who was taking no part in the fracas but just talking to a friend. He received a blow to the head before the police broke up the mob.
Under headlines such as ‘Firmness or Intolerance? It was announced that the Knutsford Town Council had banned conscientious objectors from the public library.  This, it was said was with the total agreement of the ratepayers, though the right to exclude any ‘ respectable person’ was questionable’  This decision was applauded by a large section of the community.  This story was carried by numerous other newspapers throughout the country. The Freeholders, who it is recorded ‘were up in arms’ later decreed that conscientious objectors would not be allowed to play football on any enclosures on Knutsford Heath. The town’s Ladies Tennis club passed a motion stating that ‘any member who associates with a ‘conscientious objector’ must resign at once.’
The freedom conscientious objectors enjoyed angered the local people.  They were allowed Sunday bicycle rides – but coming back to much jeering from the townspeople. One was knocked off his bike and a fight started – more townspeople arrived brandishing sticks. At least 4 conscientious objectors received bad cuts. Following this the local tradesmen refused to serve conscientious objectors, resulting them having to go farther afield to get foodstuffs. They were set upon again the following day and their bikes were smashed. Appeals were made to remove the conscientious objectors from the town.   The Leeds Mercury went on, ‘here they are wondering the countryside, free from the worries of the war and the strain of war-work.’ The editorial suggested that those conscientious objectors who fought should immediately be drafted into the army.


From Knutsford Mark wrote several letters home.

 

A letter written on Nov 12th 1917 changed from ink to pencil part way through. Presumably he didn't have a fountain pen and his inkwell ran dry!  It reads


Works Centre

Knutsford

Nov 12 1917

Ny dearest Dad and Mother

I am just writing to thank you for your letters and also for letting Ebb* come over for the weekend. You cannot imagine what a treat it was to see him and the idea of seeing the girls next week is truly delightful although I am afraid it is going to be very expensive for you and I cannot bear to think of you having to do so much for us all.

     Such a piece of news reached me this morning - too late to tell Ebb. Questions have been asked in Parliament by Philip Snowden about the condition of things in the 1st Northern Co. Non-Combatant Corps**.  He asked whether the House was aware that the Company was subjected to brutal treatment by the officer and non comm. Officers with the idea of coercing them into joining a combatant regiment whereas the men had kept their part of the bargain by sheer hard work.  Also whether one of the men had been subject to punishment for informing the Select Committee of the state of affairs and if so what steps would be taken to have the punishment …… (?)  So poor old Bartlett has just about put himself in the soup hasn't he. 

     Should the girls come over for the weekend I would be awfully glad if they would bring me a towel - bath towel in addition.

     In great haste for the post.   

Love,  Mark



*Ebb was Mark's brother Ebenezer - my grandfather.

** for more on the Non-Combatant Corps see www.longlongtrail.co.uk/army/regiments-and-corps/the-non-combatant-corps-2/


The next letter was several pages long, so I have reproduced one page here, and then typed the conents of the whole letter....




The Works Centre
Knutsford
Cheshire
Dec 17 1917

My dearest Father, Mother and Hannah

    Very many thanks for your letters and for the nice little parcel which you have sent me.
     I am sorry to say we have not ever had an acknowledgement of our letter of application for leave, so I am in much doubt as to whether the agent here (who is a very careless sort of chap) even sent it on to the Home Office Committee. I have therefore tonight made a copy of the application and am sending it to Mr Stewart direct - with what results remain to be seen. I much fear that xmas leave will not be granted, but of course it may be granted and we must make it a matter for prayer. It would be so nice to be with you all once more and you cannot tell how I long to see you all. I am indeed sorry to hear that you Mother dear have had a bad cold and hope you are better now. I myself am worlds better for the open air job and have got quite a colour back and have quite got rid of the little trouble I had and am now feeling quite fit.
     It has been quite nice working out of doors but it has been a bit of a pickle the last few days. In digging this trench some 7 feet deep we tapped a running stream of water and it has caused us a little fun as well as plenty of trouble. The sides of the trench fell in once or twice - and talk about mud!! After work each day we are a sight to behold - absolutely plastered and gammed up with mud. Standing in water often times etc etc but despite it all I feel very very much better for it which is the main consideration.
     When you are next sending will you please put me in a few shirt buttons -  not pearl ones but the linen sort. Our laundry mangles the pearl ones in more senses than one. Also, before returning the shirts please mark them in front at the bottom of the neck opening with my name small and with a larger mark "B 1/16" which is my room number.
     I was pleased to receive Wolshaw's letter and it is my intention to write to him at the earliest possible opportunity.
     It will be splendid for you all if you can get to the South for the winter. I am sure it will be better for you all than the cold and gloomy North.
     One or two of the shops here are now trying to boycott us but we have found out others who will serve us. It does seem silly of people to do such absurd things.
     I was very much struck, as I think most people have, by the capture of Jerusalem. It makes one think that the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ may not now be long delayed. Last Sunday night at our little meeting we had a nice time thinking of that bright and blessed hope (1 John 3.1 to 3) and we also compared it with 1 Tim 1.1 where we find that that hope is even more fully described in the words "the Lord Jesus Christ who is our hope". So that it is not merely a thing or an event for which we wait but for a person and He none other than the Son of the Living God - the one who is over all God blessed for ever. More and more brethren seem to be coming here and we are now quite a nice little company. One dear chap is such a nice fellow - a Scotchy from Glasgow.
     Now, dearest Dad, with reference to the cutting you sent me. I rather think it would be better not to write to Co. Hatto nor the Tribunal as they might think we were trying to influence them. I am sure of this that if they get the L.G. Board's letter they will favourably consider my case. As you know, I have not felt that I could ask them to do anything much for me, and I don't feel very much inclined to do so now, although I hope you won't feel  that I do not very very much appreciate the love that prompts you to offer to do this and so many other things for me. I hope you won't mind therefore in the circumstances.  How glad I should be to be free from all that encircles one at present you know, but as the Lord has so far delivered me even far beyond my expectations and much more than my weak faith deserved I feel I can confidently leave it absolutely in His Hands and He carrieth them whithersoever He willeth - and so do I believe it will be in this case but whether for total deliverance or for remaining temporarily in these circumstances I do not know.
     It is now supper time so I hope you won't mind my now closing with the fondest love and kisses from your ever loving
     Mark.